Notices

Live at Five with Yakkity Yaks Anything and everything news/weather related should go here




Reply
 
Bookmark and Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2011, 10:21 AM   #61
Hapyhouswf
VIP Yakkster
 
Hapyhouswf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 8,028
Thanks: 1,550
Thanked 703 Times in 590 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sphinx View Post
Nothing will be done before the 2012 election.

So we agree again?

I'm growing concerned. LOL
Oh well...It had to happen someday.......LOL
Don't be concerned be afraid....very very afraid...
Hapyhouswf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 06:39 PM   #62
Sphinx
YakBB2 WINNER & #EvilQueen!
 
Sphinx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 11,468
Thanks: 1,211
Thanked 4,330 Times in 2,904 Posts
Groans: 406
Groaned at 139 Times in 132 Posts
Default

Let the War begin

Quote:
President Obama on Monday will unveil a plan to tame the nation’s rocketing federal debt that will draw a sharp contrast with the Republican vision and amount more to an opening play in the fall’s debate over the economy than another attempt at finding common ground with the opposing party.

The president will propose $1.5 trillion in new taxes as part of a plan to find at least $3 trillion in budget savings over a decade, according to a person familiar with the matter. Combined with his call earlier this month for $450 billion in new stimulus, the proposal represents a more populist approach to confronting the nation’s economic travails than the compromises he advocated this summer.

Obama will propose new taxes on the wealthy and a special new tax for millionaires, according to White House officials. But he won’t call for any changes in Social Security, officials say, and may seek less-aggressive changes to Medicare and Medicaid than previously considered. In particular, people familiar with the matter say he is unlikely to call for an increase in the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67.

Coming as a congressional super*committee goes to work to find budget savings this fall, Obama’s position will probably delight Democrats, who have fretted for months that he is doing too little to solve the nation’s jobs crisis while being too willing to embrace major changes to Medicare and Social Security.

But his plan has little chance of passing and is already inflaming Republicans, who have vowed to oppose new taxes and have called for deep cuts in federal spending and entitlements. On Sunday, Republicans responded with vitriol to the proposal to create a special tax for millionaires.

“Class warfare may make for really good politics, but it makes for rotten economics,” Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), chairman of the House Budget Committee, said on “Fox News Sunday.” “It adds further instability to our system, more uncertainty, and it punishes job creation.”

Last week, Obama told supporters at a fundraiser in Washington that the upcoming debate will crystallize the difference between his views and the GOP’s.

“2012 is going to offer a clearer contrast than I think we’ve ever seen before,” Obama said. “If you see the direction that the Republican Party is now going in, you have a party that offers a fundamentally different vision of where America should be, and what we should be aspiring to, and what our core values are.”

White House officials say Obama will push for a new minimum tax rate on millionaires as part of a rewrite of the U.S. tax code. The measure is designed to compel the wealthiest American to pay the same share of income in taxes as middle-class families.

The proposed tax, which Democrats welcomed, will target the top 0.3 percent of American earners, whose income often comes from investment profits, which are taxed at 15 percent — compared with the top tax bracket of 35 percent that the wealthiest Americans would ordinarily pay.

Obama is planning to call the special tax the “Buffett Rule,” in reference to the billionaire investor Warren Buffett, who has said that the richest Americans should pay more in taxes. (Buffett stepped down from The Washington Post’s board of directors this year.)

“Right now, we’ve thrown a big wet blanket over the private-sector economy,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “We’ve borrowed too much. We’ve spent too much. We’re drastically over-regulating every aspect of the private sector in our country, and now we’re threatening to raise taxes on top of it. That’s not going to get the economy moving.”

Obama’s presentation Monday morning in the Rose Garden of the White House probably will include a call for at least $300 billion in savings from Medicare and Medicaid. He is also likely to call for additional spending cuts, perhaps by adjusting cost-of-living increases, scaling back farm subsidies and altering contributions to federal pensions.

The spending cuts and entitlement changes are expected to come in the form of detailed language. But the tax proposals are expected to be a series of targets and goals for a tax code overhaul aimed at lowering rates for most Americans while eliminating a variety of loopholes and deductions.

Obama is also likely to discuss corporate taxation, another sensitive issue for Democrats, because the White House is seeking to lower rates for businesses overall.

As of this summer, Obama was proposing an extension in the 2011 payroll tax cut and a renewal of unemployment benefits as the centerpiece of his economic strategy — measures that would pump about $160 billion into the economy. The president also called for a pooling of federal resources with local and private money into a bank to hire construction workers. And he called for the passage of trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia and Panama — drawing some tensions with Democrats worried that the trade deals would drive jobs overseas.

Then after Labor Day, Obama addressed a joint session of Congress and called for nearly $450 billion in tax cuts and direct infrastructure spending to boost the economy. While he mentioned the trade agreements in that speech, he has rarely mentioned them since.

Obama had agreed to take on his own party’s sacred cows — Social Security and Medicare — in a proposed deal earlier this summer with House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio). He agreed to reduce Social Security benefits starting in 2015 and to find nearly $400 billion in savings in Medicare and Medicaid, including by raising premiums for retirees and the eligibility age from 65 to 67.

But that proposed deal, which came together under the threat that the nation’s debt ceiling would not be raised, fell apart. Another, more modest deal averted a potential default on the debt.

Since then, Obama’s advisers decided Social Security should not be a part of the president’s proposal. Aides say the program is not a driver of short- and medium-term federal deficits and thus should be examined on a separate track.

Obama’s advisers have been vigorously debating whether to include raising the Medicare eligibility age as a component in their plans — a move opposed by most Democrats. “If he eschews Social Security cuts and raising the Medicare eligibility rage, I think he’ll be moving back to mainstream Democratic policy,” said Lawrence Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute.

Advisers say the president’s plan is based on a April speech on deficit reduction, not a specific legislative compromise like the one formulated with Boehner. The April speech did not call for an increase in the eligibility age and sought about $4 trillion in deficit reduction over 12 years. About $1 trillion of those savings comes from the winding down of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A deal this summer to raise the federal debt ceiling included nearly $1 trillion in cuts in domestic spending and the creation of a congressional committee to find between $1.2 trillion and $1.5 trillion in additional budget savings.

Lately, Obama has urged the committee to find more in savings, including an additional $450 billion in tax revenue to pay for his economic stimulus proposal.

“We’re always going to be willing to work with anybody who works with us, but the president has an obligation to put forward those things that he thinks are important for our economy and for our country,” said David Axelrod, a longtime adviser to Obama.
SOURCE

Opening Salvo is how the WP put it...I think of it more or less as another battle ramping up. Boehner should have some good quotes tomorrow and Eric Cantor too.
__________________
YBB2 Winner. Long Live the Evil Fiefdom!
Que Sera, Sera
Sphinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 09:17 AM   #63
Sphinx
YakBB2 WINNER & #EvilQueen!
 
Sphinx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 11,468
Thanks: 1,211
Thanked 4,330 Times in 2,904 Posts
Groans: 406
Groaned at 139 Times in 132 Posts
Default

Quote:
(Reuters) - House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner on Monday rejected President Barack Obama's $3 trillion plan to cut U.S. deficits, saying it would fail to tackle long-term problems and would raise taxes.

In a statement, Boehner, the top Republican in Congress, said Obama "has not made a serious contribution" to the effort by a special bipartisan congressional committee that has been asked to make recommendations to reduce the deficit by $1.2 trillion over 10 years.

Boehner said the Democratic president's proposal fails to tackle the financial problems facing federal health and retirement programs and insists on raising taxes.
SOURCE

Who here is shocked?
__________________
YBB2 Winner. Long Live the Evil Fiefdom!
Que Sera, Sera
Sphinx is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


no new posts